StrongDM vs. Apono: 

StrongDM Connects Systems.
Apono Enforces Least Privilege.

If you're using StrongDM for connectivity, it may be time to solve dynamic cloud access.

Copy of Access Platform Buyer’s Guide (2025)

Apono vs. StrongDM: Side-by-Side Comparison

See how Apono's modern approach to access management compares to StrongDM

Capability
Access Model
Context-aware, policy-based JIT/JEA
Session-based, admin-managed
Ephemeral Privilege
Dynamic roles created directly on resources
⚠️ Time-bound sessions; no dynamic roles
Standing Privilege
Eliminates standing access by default
⚠️ Static roles persist outside sessions
Granularity
Resource-level (DB, K8s namespace, cloud tags)
⚠️ Coarse, account-level segmentation
Role Management
Auto-generated via flows
⚠️ Manual role configuration
Automation
Triggered by business context (tickets, risk signals)
⚠️ Basic approval workflows
Cloud-Native Design
Built for multi-cloud, DBs, Kubernetes, SaaS
⚠️ Infrastructure-focused
Innovation Velocity
Rapid releases; modern UX
⚠️ Gradual improvements
Secrets Management
No secrets required; does not store secrets
⚠️ Relies on secrets for access

Using StrongDM Today?

Qualified StrongDM customers who complete a 30-minute evaluation session receive a $200 Amazon gift card.

✔ Current StrongDM customer  ✔ Completed strategy call  ✔ No obligation

Copy of Access Platform Buyer’s Guide (2025)-2

Why Teams Hit a Wall with StrongDM

StrongDM simplifies connectivity but modern cloud environments require dynamic, context-aware privilege enforcement.

01

Connectivity-Focused Architecture

Designed to connect users to systems, not enforce dynamic, policy-based privilege at scale.

02

No Dynamic Access Creation

Roles are not created or adjusted on the fly per request.

03

Manual Role Configuration

Admins must predefine and maintain static access roles.

04

Coarse Resource Segmentation

Limited fine-grained control at folder, namespace, or resource level.

05

Infrastructure-Dependent Model

Requires routing access through infrastructure components per resource.

06

Basic Approval Workflows

Access approvals are limited to predefined flows, without contextual automation.

Why Engineering & Security Teams Choose Apono Instead

StrongDM simplifies connectivity.
Apono simplifies risk.

Cloud-native, API-first architecture

Agentless design purpose-built for multi-cloud, databases, Kubernetes, and SaaS

Dynamic, ephemeral roles

Privileges are created directly on resources per request and automatically revoked.

Context-aware policy enforcement

Access adapts to business signals like tickets and risk triggers.

Unified policy plane

Govern humans, non-human identities, and workloads under one framework.

Highly granular control

Enforce least privilege at the folder, namespace, and resource level.

Automated workflows

Integrated with Slack, Teams, IDEs, and automation tools.

“Apono enabled quick self-service and enhanced trust.” 

“Apono helps us effectively streamline access management across complex multi-could environments” 

HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise

From Overprovisioned to Zero Trust

Labelbox’s Access Story:


🎉 98% Attack surface reduction

🎉 92% of manual approvals were < 2hrs

🎉 90% Reduction in requests for risky access

See how Labelbox reduced its attack surface by 98% and eliminated overprivileged access — significantly mitigating security risks without slowing down developer productivity.

 

Read the Full Story

"I was able to create these fine-grained custom RBAC roles in Kubernetes that provide exactly the privileges needed for specific tasks, and then I manage access to those roles via Apono. Now, engineers can combine narrow roles together like Lego bricks to achieve their goals.

Aaron Bacchi, Sr. DevSecOps Engineer at LabelBox

Time to Rethink StrongDM?

Book a StrongDM migration strategy session.

🎁 Current StrongDM customers receive a $200 Amazon gift card after completing the session.